The City as Multispecies Space: Dog Walking in Downtown Belgrade during the COVID-19 Lockdown
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2298/GEI2302097ZKeywords:
human-animal relations, companion dogs, Belgrade, autoethnography, canine-assisted ethnography, COVID-19, lockdownAbstract
This paper represents an autoethnographic account of dog walking in a residential area of downtown Belgrade during the COVID-19 lockdown of early 2020. It is also an attempt at, or rather, the result, of the largely experimental practice of canine-assisted ethnography, as my dogs Dita and Ripley were instrumental during fieldwork. The lockdown, with its ill-thought-out and constantly changing rules about dog walking underlined three basic issues: 1) in a city with a huge dog owning population, public policy with regard to this issue is virtually non-existent; 2) the city lacks public green spaces, and 3) the movement patterns of dog walkers tend to converge due to the fact that the needs of the canines (both biological and social) are embedded into the architecture and planning of local neighborhoods. In this sense, the city emerges as a multispecies space, and the social patterns and walking routes of its residents who keep dogs are influenced, if not completely determined by the human-animal bond at play. This became especially visible during lockdown at times when dog walkers were the only people allowed outside. Thus, this paper analyzes how interspecies (in this case human-dog) relationships shape the functions of urban space in Belgrade.
Downloads
References
Applebaum, Jennifer W, Chuck W. Peek & Barbara A. Zsembik, 2020. “Examining U.S. Pet Ownership Using the General Social Survey.”The Social Science Journal. Published online, March 6th, 2020. DOI: 10.1080/03623319.2020.1728507
Đurđević, Goran & Suzana Marjanić 2021. “What is It Like To Be a Bat in the Time of Covid-19, or How Many Pandemics Could We Have”. Studia Mythologica Slavica 24, 24–60.
Haraway, Donna J. 2003. The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness. Chichago: Prickly Paradigm Press.
Haraway, Donna J. 2008. When Species Meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Ingold, Tim. 2011. Being Alive: Essays on Movement, Knowledge and Description. London: Routledge.
Knight, John, ed. 2005. Animals in Person: Cultural Perspectives on Humananimal Intimacies. London: Berg.
Kohn, Eduardo. 2007. How dogs dream: Amazonian natures and the politics of transspecies engagement. American Ethnologist 34 (1): 3–24.
Kohn, Eduardo. 2013. How forests think: Toward an anthropology beyond the human. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Marjanić, Suzana, 2021. „Antrozoologija zoopolisa ili grad na četiri noge“. U Savremena srpska folkloristika IX, ур. Biljana Sikimić, Branko Zlatković & Marija Dumnić Vilotijević, 147–163. Beograd–Loznica–Tršić: Udruženje folklorista Srbije.
Marjanić, Suzana. 2022. „Šišmiš ili laboratorij – ponovno oživljene rasprave o porijeklu koronavirusa lipnja 2021. godine“. In medias res: časopis filozofije medija 11 (20): 3391–3405.
Marx, Martin B., Lorann B. Stallones, Thomas F. Garrity & Timothy P. Johnson. 1988. “Demographics of Pet Ownership among U.S. Adults 21 to 64 Years of Age.” Anthrozoös (2) 1: 33–37. DOI: 10.2752/089279389787058262
Milton, Kay. 2005. “Anthropomophism or Egomorphism? The Perception of Nonhuman Persons by Human Ones.” U Animals in Person: Cultural Perspectives on Human-animal Intimacies, ed. John Knight, 255–271. Oxford: Berg.
Mullin, Molly. 1999. “Mirrors and Windows: Sociocultural Studies of HumanAnimal Relationships.” Annual Review of Anthropology 28: 201–224.
Mullin, Molly. 2002. “Animals and Anthropology.” Society and Animals 10 (4): 387– 393.
Nadasdy, Paul. 2007. “The gift in the animal: The ontology of hunting and human–animal sociality.” American ethnologist 34 (1): 25–43.
Noske, Barbara. 1993. “The animal question in anthropology: A commentary.” Society & Animals 1 (2): 185–190.
Radović, Srđan. 2021. “Walkers and Café-Goers: Public Pedestrian Spaces and Open Space Restaurants in Belgrade.” U Different Identities and Functions of Urban Space: A Comparative Study of the Circumstances in Belgrade and Athens – Book of Abstracts, ed. Gordana Blagojević, 26–27. Belgrade: Institute of Ethnography SASA.
Robins, Douglas, M., Clinton A. Sanders & Spencer E. Cahill. 1991. “Dogs and their People: Pet-Facilitated Interaction in a Public Setting.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography (20) 3: 3–25. DOI:10.1177/089124191020001001
Tsing, Anna. 2012. “Unruly Edges: Mushrooms as Companion Species.” Environmental Humanities (1): 141–154.
Tsing, Anna Lowenhaupt. 2014. “Strathern Beyond the Human: Testimony of a Spore.” Theory, Culture and Society 31 (2/3): 221–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276413509114
Tsing, Anna. 2015. The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Weaver, Harlan. 2013. “’Becoming in kind’: Race, Class, Gender and Nation in Cultures of Dog Rescue and Dogfighting.” American Quarterly 65 (3): 689–709.
Zaradija Kiš, Antonija. 2022. „Šišmiš: od pučkih predaja i predodžbe bluda do COVID-a“. U COVID-19 u humanističkoj perspektivi, ur. Ivana Katarinčić, Jelena Marković, Ines Prica & Ana-Marija Vukušić, 263–284. Zagreb: Institut za etnologiju i folkloristiku.
Žakula, Sonja. 2010. „Naučno kreiranje kulturnih predstava o životinjama.“ Master rad. Filozofski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.
Žakula, Sonja. 2017. „Zoološki vrtovi u antropološkoj perspektivi.“ Doktorska disertacija. Filozofski fakultet Univerzitetа u Beogradu.
Žakula, Sonja. 2021. „Ljudsko-životinjski odnosi u žiži interesovanja:igra/studija slučaja u Srbiji.“ Etnoantropološki problemi 16 (1): 105–133. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v16i1.4
Žakula, Sonja & Ivana Živaljević. 2018. „Izučavanje ljudsko-životinjskih odnosa u antropologiji i arheologiji I.“ Glasnik Etnografskog instituta SANU 66 (2): 255–270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/GEI1802255Z
Žakula, Sonja & Ivana Živaljević. 2019. „Izučavanje ljudsko-životinjskih odnosa u antropologiji i arheologiji II.“ Glasnik Etnografskog instituta SANU 67 (1): 153–172. https://doi.org/10.2298/GEI1901153Z
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnography SASA

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.