(De)construction of a Female Body in Euripides' Hippolytus
DOI: 10.2298/GEI1301059S УДК: 821.14'02.09-21 Еурипид 821.14'02.09:305
Abstract
Ancient Greek theatre and theatre in general, offering a special experience of reality, uses body as its medium to a great extent. At the same time, body is the sovereign of the stage, it benefits from its own possibilities and the possibilities of the text, scene, tendance of the audience. When it comes to tragedy, paradoxically enough, it possesses the greatest power and attracts the highest attention when it reaches the limits of its strength, when it walks on the edge, when it experiences labor, pain, suffering, and even death. Female body has been, and not only in ancient times, perceived as more fragile, open, susceptible to influences, more prone and inclined to experiences such as pleasure and pain. This perception is one of dimensions of a complex polarity in which woman takes place of the other. The conflict between male and female character is in the focus of dramatic action very often: in the opus of Euripides in a way which is maybe the closest to the contemporary audience and readers. This paper has taken as its case study Euripides’ drama Hippolitus, which characterizes a woman as a δύστροπος ἁρμονία. This „reversed, disonant harmony“ is placed within a female body. Biological limitations force a female being to adapt, mutate, to be at odds with her very self – that is how her inner conflict and ambiguity appear. In reading the chosen tragedy, philological and anthropological will encounter together with the perspectives of gender and culture studies. The here offered reading of Hippolitus is given with the awareness of the struggle for body (or against it) in the XXI century. Contemporary anthropology, other social sciences and humanities prominently aim their attention towards social and cultural dimensions of the body’s existence. Medicine and sport vest in the body a media dimension, being concern with its limitations. On the other hand, the today body has increasingly been an object of interpretations, decoding, studying, virtualization, reading and re-reading, and decreasingly an object (and even subject) of reception and experience by the means of sences. On the trail of “somatosophic” thought that the body is an agent for accomplishing interchange, communication, dialog, that eros beholds a dialogical nature as its most distinctive feature, and that there is a desire for dialog in the essence of an erotic desire, it could be said that Euripides’ Phaedra longed for interchange and communication, for understanding and empathy – for eros as dialog. This cry and this desire were placed within a female body which witnessed, with its condition, decadent process and finally dissolution, a non-fulfillment of the essential need.
Key words: Euripides (cca 480– 406 BC), Phaedra, woman, body, δύστροπος ἁρμονία, the self and the other, eros and dialog.
References
Еурипид, Баханткиње: Euripides, Euripidis Fabulae, ed. Gilbert Murray, vol. 3.
Oxford. Clarendon Press, Oxford. 1913. Коришћен грчки текст са сајта
http://www.perseus.tufts.edu.
Еурипид, Хиполит: Kovacs 1995: Euripides: Children of Heracles, Hippolytus,
Andromache, Hecuba, edited and translated by David Kovacs, Loeb Classical
Library No. 484.
Хесиод, Послови и дани: Hesiod, Poslovi i dani, Postanak bogova, Homerove himne,
preveo Branimir Glavičić, Zagreb: Demetra, Filološka biblioteka Dimitrija
Savića, 2005.
Хесиод, Постанак богова: Hesiod, Poslovi i dani, Postanak bogova, Homerove
himne, preveo Branimir Glavičić, Zagreb: Demetra, Filološka biblioteka
Dimitrija Savića, 2005.
Тукидид, Пелопонески рат: Тукидид, Пелопонески рат, превод Душанка
Обрадовић, Београд: Просвета 1999.
Веб презентације:
http://www.bodiesreveаled.com
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phaedra
http://www.perseus.tufts.edu.
Речници и лексикони:
OCD 1996: The Oxford Classical Dictionary. Third Edition. Edited by Simon
Hornblower and Antony Spawforth. New York: Oxford University Press 1996.
Liddel and Scott 1975: Greek–English Lexicon, Oxford: The Clarendon press.
Литература:
Битен 2010: Ан-Мари Битен, Стара Грчка, превео Бојан Савић Остојић, Београд :
Клио. (Anne-Marie Buttin, La Grèce classique, Edition Belles Lettres, 2000.)
Епштејн 2009: Михаил Наумович Епштејн, Филозофија тела, превела Радмила
Мечанин, Београд: Геопоетика. (Михаил Наумович Эпштейн, Философия
тела 2006.)
Мари 1999: Озвин Мари, „Живот и друштво у класичној Грчкој“ у: Оксфордска
историја Грчке и хеленистичког свијета, приредили Џон Бордман,
Џаспер Грифин и Озвин Мари, превео Небојша Порчић, Београд: Клио.
(The Oxford History of Greece and Hellenistic World, Oxford: Oxford
University Press 1988.)
Редфилд 2007: Џејмс Редфилд, „Homo domesticus“ у:, Ликови старе Грчке,
приредио Жан-Пјер Вернан, превели Драгана Банковић, Душан Поповић,
Јована Поповић, Београд: Клио (L’ Uomo Greco, a cura di Jean-Pierre
Vernant, Gius. Laterza & Figli S.p.a., Roma – Bari 1991.)
Шијаковић 2011: Ђурђина Шијаковић, „Обликовање болa: античка грчка
тужбалица и њен терапеутски аспект“: Гласник етнографског института
САНУ LIX(1), уредила Драгана Радојичић, Београд: Етнографски
институт САНУ 2011.
Alexiou 2002: Margaret Alexiou, The Ritual Lament in Greek Tradition,
Rowman&Littlefield, Oxford.
Blundell 1995: Sue Blundell, Women in Ancient Greece, Cambridge, Massachusetts:
Harvard University Press.
Burian 1997: „Myth into mythos: the shaping of tragic plot“ : The Cambridge
Companion to Greek Tragedy, edited by P. E. Easterling, Cambridge
University Press, 1997.
Dover 1974: K. J. Dover, Greek Popular Morality in the time of Plato and Aristotle,
Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Flacelière 1979, Robert Flacelière: Grčka u doba Perikla, prevela Vita Klaić, Zagreb:
Naprijed. (Flacelière Robert, La vie quotidienne en Grèce au siècle de Périclès,
Librairie Hacbette 1959)
Hall 1997: Edith Hall, „The sociology of Athenian tragedy“: The Cambridge
Companion to Greek Tragedy, edited by P. E. Easterling, Cambridge
University Press.
Holmes 2010: Brooke Holmes, The Symptom and the Subject: The Emergence of the
Physical Body in Ancient Greece, Princeton University Press. Princeton –
Woodstock.
Holst-Warhaft 1995: Gail Holst-Warhaft, Dangerous Voices: Women’s Lament and
greek Literature, T J Press, Patsdow, Cornwall.
Ivanović – Šarčević 2002: Zorica Ivanović, Predrag Šarčević, „O statusu tela u
antropologiji“: Kultura: časopis za teoriju i sociologiju kulture i kulturnu
politiku, 105/106, Beograd: 2002.
Jevremović 2007: Petar Jevremović, Telo, fantazam, simbol, Beograd 2007, Službeni
Glasnik.
Kac 2007, Merilin Kac: „Žene, deca i muškarci“: Kembridž ilustrovana istorija: Antička
Grčka, priredio Pol Kartlidž, preveli Branislav Kovačević i Slađana
Milinković, Novi Sad: Stylos. (, The Cambridge Illustrated History of Ancient
Greece, edited by Paul Cartledge, 1998.)
Loraux 1995: Nicole Loraux, The experiences of Tiresias: The Feminine and the Greek
Man, translated in English by Paula Wissing, Princeton University Press, New
Jersey. (Nicole Loraux, Les Expériences de Tirésias. Le féminin et l’homme
grec, Paris 1990: Gallimard, NRF Essais.)
Loraux 1998: Nicole Loraux, Mothers in Morning, translated in English by Elizabeth
Trapnell Rawlings, Cornell University Press. (Les Mères en deuil, Paris, Seuil,
1990.)
Stevanović 2009: Lаdа Stevanović, Laughing at the Funeral: Gender and Anthropology
in the Greek Funeral Rites. Belgrade: Institute of Ethnography SASA.
Tyrrell 1984: W.B. Tyrrell, Amazons: A Study of Athenians Mythmaking, The Johns
Hopkins University Press.
Zeitlin 1990: Froma Zeitlin, “Playing the Other: Theater, Theatricality, and the
Feminine in Greek Drama“ :. Nothing to do with Dionysos? Athenian Drama in
Its Social Context. edited by John J. Winkler and Froma I Zeitlin, Princeton,
New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Zeitlin 1995: Froma Zeitlin, Playing the Other: Gender and Society in Classical Greek
Literature, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
