COUNTER-URBANIZATION AND “RETURN” TO RURALITY? IMPLICATIONS OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC IN BULGARIA

Authors

  • Desislava Pileva Institute of Ethnology and Folklore Studies with Ethnographic Museum Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia Author
  • Ivaylo Markov Institute of Ethnology and Folklore Studies with Ethnographic Museum Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2298/GEI2103543P

Keywords:

rural, urban, internal migration, home-making, pandemic

Abstract

The studies of the movements between the city and the village generally (especially in Southeastern Europe) refer to analyses of the processes of urbanization, and rarely focus on the so-called counter-urbanization. However, over the past decade, the increasing environmental sensitivity of a part of the urban population in active age, as well as the emergence of social movements that promote a slow and environmentally friendly lifestyle have intensified the anti-urban trends. The COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 and the measures introduced to limit its spread have created a new social reality in which people continue their lives in ways that for many differ from the previous routine, influencing also the mobility patterns. Hence, the article aims at analyzing the urban-rural migration in Bulgaria within the context of the current coronavirus crises. Our thesis is that the pandemic enhances internal mobility in the medium term, since the physical distancing motivates people to spend more time outdoors and away from the urban environment. At the same time, some of them are able to seek spatial freedom in rural areas due to the opportunity to work and study from distance. In this respect, the ethnographic case studies presented in the text show the peculiar impact the constantly alternating imposition and lifting of certain restrictions has on the mobility decision-making and lifestyle of individuals and entire families..

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Berry, Brian. 1976. “The Counterurbanization Process: Urban America since 1970.” Urban Affairs Annual Reviews 11 (Urbanization and Counterurbanization): 17–30.

Boterman, Willem R. 2020. “Urban–Rural Polarisation in Times of the Corona Outbreak? The Early Demographic and Geographic Patterns of the SARS‐CoV‐2 Epidemic in the Netherlands.” Journal of Economic and Human Geography 111 (3): 513–529. DOI: 10.1111/tesg.12437.

Castles, Stephan. 2010. “Understanding Global Migration: A Social Transformation Perspective.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 36 (10): 1565–1586. DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2010.489381.

Dahms, Fred & Janine McComb. 1999. “’Counterurbanization’, Interaction and Functional Change in a Rural Amenity Area – a Canadian Example.” Journal of Rural Studies 15 (2): 129–146. DOI: 10.1016/S0743-0167(98)00056-4.

Finnsson, Páll T. 2020. “Will Rural Living Become More Desirable Post-Corona?” Nordregio Magazine 3 (Post-pandemic regional development), https://nordregio.org/nordregio-magazine/issues/post-pandemic-regionaldevelopment/will-rural-living-become-more-desirable-post-corona (Accessed May 11, 2021).

Gallent, Nick. 2020. “COVID-19 and the Flight to Second Homes.” Town & Country Planning 89 (4/5): 141–144.

Halfacree, Keith H., 2011. “Heterolocal Identities? Counter-Urbanisation, Second Homes, and Rural Consumption in the Era of Mobilities.” Population, Space and Place 18 (2): 209–224. DOI: 10.1002/psp.665.

Kopeva, Diana & Nivelin Noev. 2003. “Subsistence Farming in Bulgaria: Between Tradition and Market Requirements.” In Subsistence Agriculture in Central and Eastern Europe: How to Break the Vicious Circle? eds. Abele, Steffen & Klaus Frohberg, 133–146. Halle: IAMO.

Kozhukharova-Zhivkova, Veska. 1996. Seloto – v tŭrsene na optimistichna strategii ͡ a. Sofii ͡ a: Ali ͡a.

Malatzky, Christina, Judy Gillespie, Danielle Couch & Catherine Cosgrave. 2020. “Why Place Matters: A Rurally-Orientated Analysis of COVID-19’s Differential Impacts.” Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 2 (1), https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590291120300528?via%3Dihub (Accessed May 11, 2021). DOI: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100063.

Müller, Dietter. 2007. “Second Homes in the Nordic Countries: between Common Heritage and Exclusive Commodity.” Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism 7 (3): 193–201. DOI: 10.1080/15022250701300272

Onishi, Norimitsu and Constant Méheut. 2020. “Rich Europeans Flee Virus for 2nd Homes, Spreading Fear and Fury”. New York Times, 29 March, https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/29/world/europe/rich-coronavirussecond-homes.html (Accessed May 11, 2021).

Overvåg, Kjell. 2009. Second Homes in Eastern Norway. Doctoral Theses at NTNU 238, Norwegian University of Science and Technology: Trondheim.

Pokrovskiĭ, Nikita E., Alena I͡ u. Makshanchikova & Egor Aleksandrovich Nikishin. 2020. “Obratnai ͡ a migrat ͡ sii ͡ a v uslovii ͡ akh pandemicheskogo krizisa: vnegorodskie prostranstva Rossii kak resurs adaptat ͡ sii.” Sot ͡ siologicheskie issledovanii ͡ a 12: 54–64.

Quinn, Bernadette. 2004. “Dwelling through Multiple Places: A Case Study of Second Home Ownership in Ireland.” In Tourism, Mobility and Second Homes, eds. Hall Michael & Dieter Müller, 113–129. Channel View Publications: Clevedon.

Rose, Jeff. 2020. “Time to Move? Data Suggests Americans May Flee to Rural Areas Post-COVID.” Forbes, 06. 08. 2020, https://www.forbes.com/sites/jrose/2020/08/06/time-to-move-datasuggests-americans-may-flee-to-rural-areas-post-covid/?sh=9f2d65671612 (Accessed May 11, 2021).

Ross, Hannah. 2020. “Post-COVID-19 Wave of Regional Migration Predicted as People Seek Simpler Life, Get Back to Basics.” ABC News, 10. 05. 2020, https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-05-10/post-covid-19-pandemic-simplerlife-migration/12229082 (Accessed May 11, 2021).

Seraphin, Hugues & Frederic Dosquet. 2020. “Mountain Tourism and Second Home Tourism as Post COVID-19 Lockdown Placebo?” Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes 12 (4): 485–500. DOI: 10.1108/WHATT-05-2020-0027.

Shishmanova, Marii ͡ a V. 2014. “Vŭtreshna migrat ͡ sii ͡ a na naselenieto mezhdu gradovete i selata za desetgodishnii ͡ a period 2003 – 2013 g.” In Bulgaria Rusticana: Dŭlgoto pŭtuvane kŭm seloto, sŭst. Koleva, Galina, 91–103. Troi ͡ an: Ali ͡ a

Shucksmith, Mark. 1983. “Second Homes – a Framework for Policy.” Town Planning Review 54: 174–193.

Sietchiping, Remy, Thomas Forster, Florence Egal, Grace Githiri & Eol Chae. 2020. “COVID-19 through the Lens of Urban Rural Linkages – Guiding Principles and Framework for Action (URL-GP).” UN-Habitat, https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/2020/07/issue_brief_covid-19_through_the_lens_of_urban_rural_linkages_web_revised.pdf (Accessed May 11, 2021).

Simeonova, Marina, I͡ asen K’osev & Nikolaĭ Naĭdenov. 2020. “Migrat ͡ sionni prot ͡ sesi, strukturoopredeli ͡ ashti selishtnata mrezha v Bŭlgarii ͡ a”. Godishnik na UASG, 53 (4).

Slavova, Marina. 2019. "Peri-urbanizat ͡ sii ͡ ata v Bŭlgarii ͡ a – potent ͡ sial za stroitelnii ͡ a bransh". Nedvizhimi imoti i biznes 3 (1): 40–51.

Statistical Yearbook. 2020. Republic of Bulgaria. Statistical Yearbook 2019. Sofia: National Statistic Institute, https://www.nsi.bg/sites/default/files/files/publications/God2019.pdf (Accessed May 11, 2021).

Downloads

Published

2021-12-15

How to Cite

Pileva, D., & Markov, I. (2021). COUNTER-URBANIZATION AND “RETURN” TO RURALITY? IMPLICATIONS OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC IN BULGARIA. Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnography SASA, 69(3), 543–560. https://doi.org/10.2298/GEI2103543P

Similar Articles

1-10 of 52

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.