Изучавање људско–животињских односа у антропологији и археологији II

ДОИ: https://doi.org/10.2298/GEI1901153Z УДК 39:902::599.89:591.5 Прегледни рад

Сажетак

Овај текст представља други од планирана два чланка у којима се бавимо проблемом изучавања људско–животињских односа у етнологији и антропологији и археологији. У првом раду (Жакула и Живаљевић 2018), мапирале смо начине на које је питање животиња и њихових међуодноса са људима у нашим дисциплинама третирано до, угрубо, осамдесетих година 20. века. У овом раду представићемо нове истраживачке приступе који су се развили од краја 20. века надаље, а који се одликују, пре свега, третманом животиња као активних учесница у људском друштву и култури, и могу се објединити под кишобран-термином животињски обрт.
Кључне речи: интердисциплинарност, етнологија и антропологија, археологија, људско-животињски односи

Reference

Alberti, Benjamin & Tamara L. Bray. 2009. “Animating Archaeology: of Subjects, Objects and Alternative Ontologies. Introduction.” Cambridge Archaeological
Journal 19 (3): 337–43.
Argent, Gala. 2010. “Do the clothes make the horse? Relationality, roles and statuses in Iron Age Inner Asia.“ World Archaeology 42 (2): 157–174.
Argent, Gala. 2016. ”Killing (constructed) horses – interspecies elders, empathy and emotion, and the Pazyryk horse sacrifices.” In People with Animals: Perspectives & Studies in Ethnozooarchaeology, ed. L. G. Broderick, 19–32. Oxford and Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
Armstrong Oma, Kristin. 2007. Human-animal Relationships: Mutual becomings in Scandinavian and Sicilian households 900-500 BC. Oslo: Unipub/Oslo Academic
Press.
Armstrong Oma, Kristin. 2010. “Between trust and domination: social contracts between humans and animals.” World Archaeology 42(2): 175–187.
Bird-David, Nurit. 1999. “’Animism’ revisited: personhood, environment and relational Epistemology.” Current Anthropology 40 (1): 67–91.
Bökönyi, Sándor. 1969. “Archaeological problems and methods of recognizing animal domestication.” In The Domestication and Exploitation of Plants and
Animals, eds. P. J. Ucko, G. W. Dimbleby, 219–230. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
Bökönyi, Sándor. 1974. History of Domestic Mammals in Central and Eastern Europe. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
Borić, Dušan & John Robb, eds. 2008. Past Bodies. Body-Centred Research in Archaeology. Oxford: Oxbow Books.
Boyd, Brian. 2017. “Archaeology and Human-Animal relations: thinking through Anthropocentrism.” Annual Review of Anthropology 46: 299–316.
Brown, Linda A. & William H. Walker. 2008. “Prologue: archaeology, animism and non-human agents.” Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 15: 297–299.
Candea, Matei. 2010. “‘I fell in love with Carlos the meerkat‘: Engagement and detachment in human–animal relations.“ American Ethnologist 37 (2): 241–258.
Carrithers, Michael, et al. 2010. “Ontology is just another word for culture.“ Critique of Anthropology 30 (2): 152–200.
Clutton-Brock, Juliet. 1999. A Natural History of Domesticated Mammals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Conneller, Chantal. 2004. “Becoming deer: corporeal transformations at Star Carr.” Archaeological Dialogues 11 (1): 37–56.
Deleuze, Gilles & Felix Guatarri. 1988. A Thousand Plateaus. Capitalism and Schizophrenia. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Descola, Philippe. 2013. Beyond Nature and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Descola, Philippe. & Gisli Pálsson, eds. 1996. Nature and Society: Anthropological Perspectives. New York/London: Routledge.
Flynn, Clifton P., ed. 2008. Social Creatures: a Human and Animal Studies Reader. New York: Lantern Books.
Flynn, Clifton P. 2008a. “Social Creatures: an Introduction.” In Social Creatures: a Human and Animal Studies Reader, ed. Flynn, C.P., xiii–xvii. New York: Lantern Books.
Fowler, Chris. 2004. The Archaeology of Personhood. An Anthropological Approach. London: Routledge.
Fowler, Chris. 2010. “From identity and material culture to personhood and materiality.” In The Oxford Handbook of Material Culture Studies, eds. D. Hicks,
M. Beaudry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gell, Alfred. 1998. Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory. New York: Clarendon Press.
Hamilakis, Yannis, Mark Pluciennik, & Sarah Tarlow, eds. 2002. Thinking through the Body. Archaeologies of Corporeality. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishing.
Haraway, Donna. 2003. The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness. Chichago: Prickly Paradigm Press.
Haraway, Donna. 2008. When Species Meet. Minneapolis/London: University of Minnesota Press.
Hewes, Gordon W. 1948. “The Rubric ‘Fishing and Fisheries’.” American Anthropologist 50 (2): 238–246.
Hill, Erica. 2011. “Animals as agents: hunting ritual and relational ontologies in prehistoric Alaska and Chukotka.” Cambridge Archaeological Journal 21 (3): 407-426.
Hill, Erica. 2013. “Archaeology and animal persons: toward a prehistory of humananimal relations.” Environment and Society: Advances in Research 4: 117–136.
Holbraad, Martin. 2013. “Turning a corner – preamble for ‘The relative native’ by Eduardo Viveiros de Castro”, https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.14318/hau3.3.032#hau3.3.033_fn1 (2.4.2018.)
Hudson, Mark J. et. al. 2012. “Prospects and challenges for an archaeology of global climate change.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 3(4): 313–328.
Ingold, Tim, ed. 1988. What is an Animal? London and Boston: Unwin Hyman.
Ingold, Tim. 1994. “From trust to domination. An alternative history of humananimal relations”." In Animals and Human Society: Changing Perspectives, eds. A. Manning & J. Serpell, 1–22. London and New York: Routledge.
Ivanović, Zorica & Predrag Šarčević. 2003. “O statusu tela u antropologiju.“ Kultura 105/106: 9–24.
Knight, John, ed. 2005. Introduction. In Animals in Person: Cultural Perspectives on Human-animal Intimacies. London: Berg.
Knight, John. 2005a. “Feeding Mr Monkey: Cross-species Food ’Exchange’ in Japanese Monkey Parks.“ In Animals in Person: Cultural Perspectives on Human-
animal Intimacies, ed. J. Knight, 231–254. London: Berg.
Kohn, Eduardo. 2007. “How dogs dream: Amazonian natures and the politics of transspecies engagement.” American Ethnologist 34 (1): 3–24.
Kohn, Eduardo. 2013. How forests think: Toward an anthropology beyond the human. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Latour, Bruno & Steve Woolgar. 1979. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Lič, Edmund. 2002. Kultura i komunikacija. Beograd: XX vek.
Mlekuž, Dimitrij. 2007. “’Sheep are your mother’: rhyta and the interspecies politics in the Neolithic of the eastern Adriatic.” Documenta Praehistorica XXXIV: 267–280.
Mullin, Molly. 1999. “Mirrors and Windows: Sociocultural Studies of Human-Animal Relationships.” Annual Review of Anthropology 28: 201–224.
Nadasdy, Paul. 2007. “The gift in the animal: The ontology of hunting and human–animal sociality.“ American ethnologist 34 (1): 25–43.
O’Connor, Terry P. 1997. “Working at relationships: another look at animal domestication.” Antiquity 71 (271): 149–156.
Orton, David. 2010. “Both subject and object: herding, inalienability and sentient property in prehistory.” World Archaeology 42 (2): 188–200.
Ton Otto and Rane Willerslev. 2013. “Introduction: ‘Value as theory’: Comparison, cultural critique, and guerilla ethnographic theory.” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 3, no. 1: 1–20.
Overton, N. J. 2014. “Review of Russell, N. Social Zooarchaeology: Humans and Animals in Prehistory.” Journal of Field Archaeology 39 (1): 108–109.
Overton, Nick J. 2018. “The rhythm of life. Exploring the role of daily and seasonal rhythms in the development of human-nonhuman relationships in the British
Early Mesolithic.” In Multispecies Archaeology, ed. S. Pilaar-Birch, 295–309. London and New York: Routledge.
Overton, Nick J. & Yannis Hamilakis. 2013. “A manifesto for a social zooarchaeology. Swans and other beings in the Mesolithic.” Archaeological dialogues
20 (2): 111–136.
Russell, Nerissa. 2012. Social Zooarchaeology: Humans and Animals in Prehistory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Saint-Exupéry, Antoine de. 1988. Mali princ. Zagreb: Mladost.
Sanders, Clinton R. & Arnold Arluke. 1993. “If Lions Could Speak: Investigating the AnimalHuman Relationship and the Perspectives of Nonhuman Others.”
The Sociological Quarterly 34 (36): 377–390.
Shapiro, Kenneth. 2008. “Introduction to human animal studies.” In Social Creatures: A Human and Animal Studies Reader, ed. C. Flynn, 3–7. New York: Lantern Books.
Strathern, Marilyn. 1980. “No nature; no culture.” In Nature, culture, gender, eds. MacCormack, C. & Strathern, M. Cambridge: University Press.
Thomas, Julian S. 2007. “Archaeology’s humanism and the materiality of the body.” In The Archaeology of Identities, ed. T. Insoll, 211–224. London and New York: Routledge.
Tsing, Anna. 2012. “Unruly edges: mushrooms as companion species.” Environmental Humanities 1: 141–154.
Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. 1998. “Cosmological Deixis and Amerindian Perspectivism.” The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 4 (3): 469–488.
Zeuner, Frederick Everard. 1963. A History of Domesticated Animals. London: Hutchinson.
Žakula, Sonja. 2013. “(Ne)razumeti Darvina: evolucija i konstrukcija granice između ljudi i životinja.” In Zbornik radova Etnografskog instituta SANU – Kulturna prožimanja: antropološke perspektive, ed. S. Radović, 31–28. Beograd: Etnografski institut SANU.
Žakula, Sonja & Ivana Živaljević. 2018. “Izučavanje ljudsko-životinjskih odnosa u antropologiji i arheologiji I.“ Glasnik Etnografskog instituta SANU LXVI (2): 255–270.
Živaljević, Ivana. 2015. “Concepts of the body and personhood in the Mesolithic-Neolithic Danube Gorges: interpreting animal remains from human burials.”
Etnoantropološki problemi 10 (3): 675–699.
Објављено
29.05.2019.
Како цитирати
ŽAKULA, Sonja; ŽIVALJEVIĆ, Ivana. Изучавање људско–животињских односа у антропологији и археологији II. Гласник Етнографског института САНУ, [S.l.], v. 67, n. 1, p. 153-172, may 2019. ISSN 2334-8259. Доступно на:
<https://www.ei.sanu.ac.rs/index.php/gei/article/view/799>.
Датум приступа: 19 apr. 2024