Мислити изван мреже. Критичко преиспитивање граница теорије „актер-мрежа“
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/GEI2501247M UDC: 39:004.738.5 Прегледни рад
Сажетак
Овај чланак критички разматра ограничења и изазове теорије актера-мрежа (ANT) у савременој социолошкој мисли. Првобитно развијена као одговор на структуралистичке и конструктивистичке парадигме, ANT је понудила радикалну методолошку алтернативу, истичући релационалност актера и настајање мрежа уместо унапред датих тзв. друштвених структура. Овај приступ је значајно обликовао дисциплине као што су наука о технологији, политичка социологија и управљање животном средином, али је истовремено био предмет снажне критике. Критичари тврде да ANT-ово одбијање да се бави структурним одредницама, макрополитичким ограничењима и историјским асиметријама умањује његову објашњавачку снагу, нарочито у контексту доминације, хијерархије и системских неједнакости. Овај чланак истражује да ли ANT има потенцијал да се развија изван својих дескриптивних оквира како би одговорио на ове изазове без компромитовања својих основних принципа. Анализом асиметрија моћи, дигиталног управљања и еколошких криза, аутор преиспитује да ли ANT може да помири емпиријско истраживање са критичким ангажманом. На крају, тврди се да будућност ANT-а зависи од његове способности да балансира између методолошке отворености и теоријске рефлексивности, постављајући шира питања о границама теорије која тежи да превазиђе епистемолошка ограничења која је сама дефинисала.
Кључне речи: Теорија актера-мреже (ANT), асиметрије моћи, структурна неједнакост, критичка социологија, епистемолошка ограничења
Reference
Amsterdamska, Olga. 1990. “Surely You Are Joking, Monsieur Latour!” Science, Technology, & Human Values 15 (4): 495–504. https://www.jstor.org/stable/689826
Blok, Anders, and Casper Bruun Jensen. 2011. “Bruno Latour: Hybrid Thoughts in a Hybrid World.” Routledge.
Bloor, David. 1999. “Anti-Latour.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 30 (1): 81–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-3681(98)00038-7
Bošković, Aleksandar. 2015. „Ozbiljne igre: teorije u antropologiji posle 1980-ih“, Etnoantropološki problemi 10(1): 19–41.
Callon, Michel. 1986a. “Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay.” In J. Law (Ed.),
Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? (pp. 196–233). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Callon, Michel. 1986b. “The Sociology of an Actor-Network: The Case of the Electric Vehicle.” In M. Callon, J. Law, & A. Rip (Ed.), Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology: Sociology of Science in the Real World (pp. 19-34). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Callon, Michel. 1998. “The Laws of the Markets.” In M. Callon (Ed.), The Laws of the Markets (pp. 1-57). Oxford: Blackwell.
Callon, Michel. 2006a. “Les réseaux sociaux à l’aune de la théorie de l’acteur-réseau. Entretien avec Michel Ferrary.” Sociologies pratiques, 2(13), 37–44.
Callon, Michel. 2006b. “Sociologie de l’acteur-réseau.” In B. Latour, M. Akrich, & M. Callon (Ed.), Sociologie de la traduction: Textes fondateurs. Paris: École des Mines.
Callon, Michel. 2008, “What Does it Mean to Say That Economics Is Performative ?”, In D. MacKenzie, F. Muniesa, L. Siu (Ed.), Do Economists Make Markets?: On the Performativity of Economics (pp. 311–357). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Callon, Michel, and John Law. 2005. “On Qualculation, Agency, and Otherness.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 23 (5): 717–33. https://doi.org/10.1068/d343t
Collins, Harry, and Steven Yearley. 1992. “Epistemological Chicken.” In Andrew Pickering (ed.), Science as Practice and Culture (pp. 301–326). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Couldry, Nick, and Ulises A. Mejias. 2019. The Costs of Connection: How Data Is Colonizing Human Life and Appropriating It for Capitalism. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
D’Andrade, Roy. 1995. The Development of Cognitive Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Filipović, Božidar. 2012. „Bruno Latur i teorija aktera-mreže“, Filozofija i društvo 23(1): 5–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/FID1201129F
Guggenheim, Michael, and Jörg Potthast. 2011. “Symmetrical Twins: On the Relationship Between Actor-Network Theory and the Sociology of Critical Capacities.” European Journal of Social Theory 15 (2): 157–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431011423601
Haraway, Donna. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge.
Holbraad, Martin, and Morten Axel Pedersen. 2017. The Ontological Turn: An Anthropological Exposition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kelly, John D. 2014. “The Ontological Turn: Where Are We?” Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 4(1): 357–360. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau4.1.019
Latour, Bruno. 1986. “The Powers of Association.” Sociological Review 32 (S1): 264–80.
Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, Bruno. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Translated by Catherine Porter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, Bruno. 1999. Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, Bruno. 2004. Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Latour, Bruno. 2018. Down to Earth: Politics in the New Climatic Regime. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Latour, Bruno, and Steve Woolgar. 1979. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Law, John. 1992a. A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination. London: Routledge.
Law, John. 1992b. “Notes on the Theory of the Actor-Network: Ordering, Strategy, and Heterogeneity.” Systems Practice, 5(4): 379–393.
Law, John. 1994. Organizing Modernity. Oxford: Blackwell.
Law, John. 2002. Aircraft Stories: Decentering the Object in Technoscience. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Law, John. 2009. “Actor-Network Theory and Material Semiotics.” In B. Turner (Ed.), The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory (pp. 141–158). Oxford: Blackwell.
Law, John, and John Hassard, eds. 1999. Actor Network Theory and After. Oxford: Blackwell.
Marres, Noortje. 2012. Material Participation: Technology, the Environment and Everyday Publics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mladenović, Ivica, Srđan Prodanović. 2024. “Akteur Netzwerk Theorie”, In Mathias Gutmann, Benjamin Rathgeber & Klaus Wiegerling (Ed.), Handbuch Technikphilosophie (pp. 277–285), Berlin: Springer-Verlag GmbH.
Mol, Annemarie. 2002. The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Nail, Thomas. 2017. “What Is an Assemblage?” SubStance 46 (1): 21–37. DOI:10.3368/ss.46.1.21
Schinkel, Willem. 2007. Aspects of Violence: A Critical Theory. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Shapin, Steven. 1995. “Here and Everywhere: Sociology of Scientific Knowledge.” Annual Review of Sociology 21: 289–321. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.21.080195.001445.
Spasić, Ivana. 2007. “Bruno Latour, actor-networks, and the critique of critical sociology.” Filozofija i Društvo 18 (2): 43–72. https://doi.org/10.2298/FID0702043S
Vandenberghe, Frédéric. 2001. “Reconstructing Humants: A Humanist Critique of Actant-Network Theory.” Theory, Culture & Society 18 (1): 55–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327602761899147
Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. 2015. The Relative Native: Essays on Indigenous Conceptual Worlds. Chicago: Hau Books.
Wacquant, Loïc. 2002. “Putting Habitus in its Place: Rejoinder to the Symposium.” Body & Society, 20(2): 118–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X14530845
Whittle, Andrea, and André Spicer. 2008. “Is Actor Network Theory Critique?” Organization Studies 29 (4): 611–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607082223
Blok, Anders, and Casper Bruun Jensen. 2011. “Bruno Latour: Hybrid Thoughts in a Hybrid World.” Routledge.
Bloor, David. 1999. “Anti-Latour.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 30 (1): 81–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-3681(98)00038-7
Bošković, Aleksandar. 2015. „Ozbiljne igre: teorije u antropologiji posle 1980-ih“, Etnoantropološki problemi 10(1): 19–41.
Callon, Michel. 1986a. “Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay.” In J. Law (Ed.),
Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? (pp. 196–233). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Callon, Michel. 1986b. “The Sociology of an Actor-Network: The Case of the Electric Vehicle.” In M. Callon, J. Law, & A. Rip (Ed.), Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology: Sociology of Science in the Real World (pp. 19-34). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Callon, Michel. 1998. “The Laws of the Markets.” In M. Callon (Ed.), The Laws of the Markets (pp. 1-57). Oxford: Blackwell.
Callon, Michel. 2006a. “Les réseaux sociaux à l’aune de la théorie de l’acteur-réseau. Entretien avec Michel Ferrary.” Sociologies pratiques, 2(13), 37–44.
Callon, Michel. 2006b. “Sociologie de l’acteur-réseau.” In B. Latour, M. Akrich, & M. Callon (Ed.), Sociologie de la traduction: Textes fondateurs. Paris: École des Mines.
Callon, Michel. 2008, “What Does it Mean to Say That Economics Is Performative ?”, In D. MacKenzie, F. Muniesa, L. Siu (Ed.), Do Economists Make Markets?: On the Performativity of Economics (pp. 311–357). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Callon, Michel, and John Law. 2005. “On Qualculation, Agency, and Otherness.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 23 (5): 717–33. https://doi.org/10.1068/d343t
Collins, Harry, and Steven Yearley. 1992. “Epistemological Chicken.” In Andrew Pickering (ed.), Science as Practice and Culture (pp. 301–326). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Couldry, Nick, and Ulises A. Mejias. 2019. The Costs of Connection: How Data Is Colonizing Human Life and Appropriating It for Capitalism. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
D’Andrade, Roy. 1995. The Development of Cognitive Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Filipović, Božidar. 2012. „Bruno Latur i teorija aktera-mreže“, Filozofija i društvo 23(1): 5–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/FID1201129F
Guggenheim, Michael, and Jörg Potthast. 2011. “Symmetrical Twins: On the Relationship Between Actor-Network Theory and the Sociology of Critical Capacities.” European Journal of Social Theory 15 (2): 157–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431011423601
Haraway, Donna. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge.
Holbraad, Martin, and Morten Axel Pedersen. 2017. The Ontological Turn: An Anthropological Exposition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kelly, John D. 2014. “The Ontological Turn: Where Are We?” Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 4(1): 357–360. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau4.1.019
Latour, Bruno. 1986. “The Powers of Association.” Sociological Review 32 (S1): 264–80.
Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, Bruno. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Translated by Catherine Porter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, Bruno. 1999. Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, Bruno. 2004. Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Latour, Bruno. 2018. Down to Earth: Politics in the New Climatic Regime. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Latour, Bruno, and Steve Woolgar. 1979. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Law, John. 1992a. A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination. London: Routledge.
Law, John. 1992b. “Notes on the Theory of the Actor-Network: Ordering, Strategy, and Heterogeneity.” Systems Practice, 5(4): 379–393.
Law, John. 1994. Organizing Modernity. Oxford: Blackwell.
Law, John. 2002. Aircraft Stories: Decentering the Object in Technoscience. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Law, John. 2009. “Actor-Network Theory and Material Semiotics.” In B. Turner (Ed.), The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory (pp. 141–158). Oxford: Blackwell.
Law, John, and John Hassard, eds. 1999. Actor Network Theory and After. Oxford: Blackwell.
Marres, Noortje. 2012. Material Participation: Technology, the Environment and Everyday Publics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mladenović, Ivica, Srđan Prodanović. 2024. “Akteur Netzwerk Theorie”, In Mathias Gutmann, Benjamin Rathgeber & Klaus Wiegerling (Ed.), Handbuch Technikphilosophie (pp. 277–285), Berlin: Springer-Verlag GmbH.
Mol, Annemarie. 2002. The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Nail, Thomas. 2017. “What Is an Assemblage?” SubStance 46 (1): 21–37. DOI:10.3368/ss.46.1.21
Schinkel, Willem. 2007. Aspects of Violence: A Critical Theory. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Shapin, Steven. 1995. “Here and Everywhere: Sociology of Scientific Knowledge.” Annual Review of Sociology 21: 289–321. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.21.080195.001445.
Spasić, Ivana. 2007. “Bruno Latour, actor-networks, and the critique of critical sociology.” Filozofija i Društvo 18 (2): 43–72. https://doi.org/10.2298/FID0702043S
Vandenberghe, Frédéric. 2001. “Reconstructing Humants: A Humanist Critique of Actant-Network Theory.” Theory, Culture & Society 18 (1): 55–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327602761899147
Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. 2015. The Relative Native: Essays on Indigenous Conceptual Worlds. Chicago: Hau Books.
Wacquant, Loïc. 2002. “Putting Habitus in its Place: Rejoinder to the Symposium.” Body & Society, 20(2): 118–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X14530845
Whittle, Andrea, and André Spicer. 2008. “Is Actor Network Theory Critique?” Organization Studies 29 (4): 611–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607082223
Објављено
03.06.2025.
Како цитирати
MLADENOVIĆ, Ivica.
Мислити изван мреже. Критичко преиспитивање граница теорије „актер-мрежа“.
Гласник Етнографског института САНУ, [S.l.], v. 73, n. 1, p. 247–268, june 2025.
ISSN 2334-8259.
Доступно на:
<https://www.ei.sanu.ac.rs/index.php/gei/article/view/1173>.
Датум приступа: 09 july 2025
<https://www.ei.sanu.ac.rs/index.php/gei/article/view/1173>.
Датум приступа: 09 july 2025
Секција
Varia
