Digital Technologies, Closeness, and Practices of Being Together in the Context of the New Normal in Serbia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2298/GEI2402225RKeywords:
digital technologies, closeness, new normal, pandemic, everyday lifeAbstract
At the beginning of 2020, the global community faced a dramatic collapse of everyday life due to the pandemic caused by the emergence of a new coronavirus. The widespread changes in both public and private life led to the breakdown of routines and rhythms of daily life as we knew them, ushering us into a period known as the new normal. One of the main characteristics of life in the new normal has been the requirement for physical distancing and the reduction of physical contacts, or physical isolation. Under these conditions, it has become noticeable that digital technologies have become the primary element and link for establishing and maintaining social connections within the complex network of human sociability, permeating all our social relations and interactions. With this in mind, in this paper, relying on ethnography from a methodological perspective and materially oriented ontology from a theoretical perspective, I will attempt to analyze and present the changes in practices of social connection, specifically the ways in which close social ties (family, friends, and partners) and new social practices and rituals, associated with the increased use of digital technologies under the conditions of the new normal, mutually constitute each other. In this aper, the new normal is perceived as a period of uncertainty and continuous waiting, where waiting is not seen as a form of doing nothing, but rather as activity, as a time filled with a range of different behaviors and emotional reactions, shaped by the changing conditions in which people adapt to livе, creating new practices and routines in the process, while digital technologies are considered integral and equal elements of social connections and worlds, as well as active and intertwined components of everyday life. This work is based on part of the material collected during field research conducted for the purpose of writing a doctoral dissertation.
Downloads
References
Antonijević, Dragana & Ana Banić Grubišić. 2021. „Samo sapun Srbina spasava – humorističke po(r)uke o higijeni tokom KOVID-19 pandemije u Srbiji.“ U Savremena srpska folkloristika IX. Zbornik radova sa Međunarodnog naučnog skupa održanog od 2. do 4. oktobra 2020. u Tršiću, ur. Biljana Sikimić, Branko Zlatković & Marija Dumnić Vilotijević, 397–418. Beograd: Udruženje folklorista Srbije: Univerzitetska biblioteka Svetozar Marković; Loznica: Centar za kulturu Vuk Karadžić; Tršić: Naučno-obrazovno kulturni centar Vuk Karadžić.
Ayaß, Ruth. 2020. “Doing Waiting: An Ethnomethodological Analysis.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 49 (4): 419–455.
Banić Grubišić, Ana. 2022. „Koronalor – O folkloru KOVID-19 pandemije u Republici Srbiji.“ Antropologija 22 (2): 95–117.
Bauman, Zigmunt. 2009. Fluidna ljubav. Novi Sad: Mediterran Publishing.
Bennett, Jane. 2010. Vibrant Matter. A Political Ecology of Things. Durkam: Duke University Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1970. “The Berber house or the world reversed.” Social Science Information 9 (2): 151–170.
Bray, Francesca. 2008. “Constructing Intimacy: Technology, Family and Gender in East Asia.” East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal 2 (2): 151–165.
Castells, Manuel. 1999. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. New Yersey: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Costa, Elisabetta, Marc Esteve-Del-Valle & Barber Hagedoorn. 2022. “Scalable Co-presence: WhatsApp and the Mediation of Personal Relationships during the COVID-19 Lockdown.” Social Media + Society 8 (1).
Čejko, Meri. 2019. Superpovezani: internet, digitalni mediji i tehno-društveni život. Beograd: Clio.
Ehn, Billy & Orvar Löfgren. 2010. The Secret World of Doing Nothing. 1st ed. University of California Press.
Erdei, Ildiko. 2008. Antropologija potrošnje. Beograd: XX vek.
Erdei, Ildiko 2021. „Elastičnost i otpor – svakodnevne prakse u tranziciji ka postkovid-19 realnosti.“ U Svakodnevica i društveni odgovori na epidemijske krize 1914–2020, ur. Milan Ristović, 123–134. Beograd: Univerzitet u Beogradu – Filozofski fakultet.
Gasparini, Giovanni. 1995. “On Waiting.” Time & Society 4 (1): 29–45.
Gell, Alfred. 1998. Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hage, Ghassan. 2009. “Introduction.” In Waiting, Ghassan Hage, ed., 1–12. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
Harman, Graham. 2010. “Technology, objects and things in Heidegger.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 34(1): 17–25.
Harvi, Dejvid. 2012. Kratka istorija neoliberalizma. Novi Sad: Mediterran Publishing
Higgins, Rylan. 2020. “Editor’s Note.” Anthropology Now 12 (1): 1 (Special issue An Anthropology of the COVID-19 Pandemic).
Horst, Heather & Daniel Miller. 2012. Digital Anthropology. London: Berg.
Ivanović Barišić, Milina. 2023. SMS i Viber poruka: poruka za svakog i za svaku priliku. Beograd: Etnografski institut SANU.
Latour, Bruno. 1999. Pandora’s hope: essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford New York: Oxford University Press.
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1982. The Way of the Mask. Seattle. University of Washington Press.
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1987. Anthropology and Myth: Lectures, 1951-1982. R. Willis, trans. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Madianou, Mirca & Daniel Miller 2012. “Polymedia: Towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication.” International Journal of Cultural Studies 16 (2): 169–187.
Mandić, Marina. 2021. „Viralna apokalipsa: diskursi širenja i zaustavljanja epidemije na primeru filmskih narativa o zombijima.“ Glasnik Etnografskog instituta SANU 69 (3): 675–687.
Mandić, Marina & Vesna Trifunović. 2023. „Poslednji među zdravima: karantin kao kritika u dva apokaliptična narativa popularne kulture.“ Glasnik Etnografskog instituta SANU 71 (3): 159–178.
Matović, Marijana. 2021. „Medijske generacije u Srbiji.“ Etnoantropološki problemi 16 (2): 459–490.
Milanović, Nevena. 2021. „Imperativ ’brige o sebi’ tokom pandemije kovida-19: prakse postizanja emotivnog i fizičkog blagostanja“. U Kovid 19 u Srbiji 20, ur. Bojan Žikić, 189–202. Beograd: Univerzitet u Beogradu – Filozofski fakultet.
Miller, Daniel. 1987. Material Culture and Mass Consumption. London: Blackwell.
Miller, Daniel. 2011. Tales from Facebook. Cambridge: Polity.
Miller, Daniel, Elisabetta Costa, Nell Haynes, Tom McDonald, Razvan Nicolescu, Jolynna Sinanan, Juliano Spyer, Shriram Venkatraman & Xinyuan Wang. 2016. How the World Changed Social Media. London: UCL Press.
Mitrović, М. Katarina. 2021. „Rad od kuće: novi pristupi životnim prostorima tokom Kovid-19 pandemije.“ U Kovid 19 u Srbiji 20, ur. Bojan Žikić, 189–202. Beograd: Univerzitet u Beogradu – Filozofski fakultet.
Moran, Džo. 2011. Čitanje svakodnevnice. Beograd: XX vek.
Morgan, Lewis Henry. 1966. Houses and house-life of the American aborigines. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Poster. Mark. 1999. “Underdetermination.” New Media and Society 1 (1): 12–17.
Prensky, Marc. 1996. “Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants.” On the Horizont 9 (5): 1–6.
Radulović Lidija. 2021. „’Fizička distanca’ vice versa ’socijalna distanca’ u vreme pandemije – antropološki ogledi o društvenim i kulturnim praksama.“ U Svakodnevica i društveni odgovori na epidemijske krize 1914–2020, ur. Milan Ristović, 109–122. Beograd: Univerzitet u Beogradu – Filozofski fakultet.
Ristović, Milan, ur. 2021. Svakodnevica i društveni odgovori na epidemijske krize 1914–2020. Beograd: Univerzitet u Beogradu – Filozofski fakultet.
Roberts, L. Jennifer. 2017. “Things. Material Turn, Transnational Turn.” American Art 2017 31 (2): 64–69.
Salmond, Amiria. 2012. “Digital Subject, Cultural Objects. Special Issue Introduciton.” Journal of Material Culture 17 (3): 211–228.
Schatzki, Theodore. 2010. “Materiality and Social Life.” Nature and Culture 5 (2): 123–149.
Schweizer, Harold. 2008. On Waiting. London: Routledge.
Silverstone, Roger. 1994. Television and Everyday life. London: Routledge.
Stajić Mladen, Bojan Žikić & Marko Pišev. 2021. „Šumovi u komunikaciji: „dvostruka obavezanost“ tokom epidemije kovida 19 u Srbiji.“ Glasnik Etnografskog instituta SANU 69 (3): 593–608.
Tacchi, Jo. 2002. Radio Texture: Between Self and Others. In The Anthropology of Media: A Reader, Wilk, R & Askew, K, eds., 241–257. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Terkl, Šeri. 2020. Obnovimo razgovor: Moć razgovora u digitalnom dobu. Beograd: Clio.
Trifunović, Vesna & Ivan Đorđević, ur. 2021a. Kultura „nove normalnosti“. Lokalne i globalne perspektive. Glasnik Etnografskog instituta SANU 69 (3): 519–687.
Trifunović, Vesna & Ivan Đorđević. 2021b. Kultura „nove normalnosti“ – značenje i upotreba pojma. Glasnik Etnografskog instituta SANU 69 (3): 519–530.
Virilio, Paul. 2002. Desert Screen: War at the Speed of Light. London: Athlone Press.
Wilk, Richard. 2002. “Television, time, and the national imaginary in Belize.” In Media worlds: Anthropology on new terrain, Ginsburg, Faye D., Lila AbuLughod, & Brian Larkin, eds.,171–86. Oaklend: University of California Press
Woodward, Sophie. 2020. Material Methods: Researching and Thinking with Things. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Žikić, Bojan, ur. 2021. Kovid 19 u Srbiji 20. Beograd: Univerzitet u Beogradu – Filozofski fakultet.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 ГЛАСНИК ЕТНОГРАФСКОГ ИНСТИТУТА САНУ
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
