Anthropological Dimension of the Parable of the Talents (Mt 25, 14–30)

Authors

  • ВЛАДАН ТАТАЛОВИЋ Православни богословски факултет, Универзитет у Београду Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2298/GEI2402271T

Keywords:

Gospel of Matthew, parable, slavery, profiteering, New Testament scholarship

Abstract

The paper conducts an anthropological study of Jesus’ metaphorical call to his disciples to emulate enslaved individuals who reliably carry out the business interests of their master, as conveyed in his Parable of the Talents (Mt 25, 14- 30). In the first part of the paper, the research is methodologically positioned concerning the relationship between anthropology and the Bible/biblical studies. In the second part, ethnographically collected data on the parable’s meaning is interpreted through the historical context of Matthew’s Christianity. The paper then demonstrates that the metaphor of profit-oriented slavery in the Parable of the Talents served to warn Matthew’s Christians not to falter in the face of adversities during Jesus’ absence and the inherent (Jewish) understanding of messianism. Matthew’s Christians are called by the parable to, like good and faithful slaves, overcome possible fears and urgently participate in bringing all nations into the status of their/Jesus’ disciples (28, 18-20). By showing that anthropological analysis may overcome methodological errors in the scholarly interpretation of the parable/Bible, the paper also aims to promote the contribution of anthropology to biblical studies and the collaboration between the two fields.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adams, Samuel L. 2014. Social and Economic Life in Second Temple Judea. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press.

Aguilar, Mario. 2004. “Changing Models and the ‘Death’ of Culture: A Diachronic and Positive Critique of Social-Scientific Assumptions.” U Anthropology and Biblical Studies: Avenues of Approach, prir. Lawrence Louise & Mario Aguilar, 299–313. Leiden: Brill.

Atkins, Robert A. 1991. Egalitarian Community: Ethnography and Exegesis. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.

Aviam, Mordechai. 2013. “People, Land, Economy, and Belief in First-Century Galilee and Its Origins: A Comprehensive Archaeological Synthesis.” U The Galilean Economy in the Time of Jesus, prir. Fiensy David & Ralph Hawkins, 5–48. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature.

Barber, Karin. 2007. The Anthropology of Texts, Persons and Publics: Oral and Written Culture in Africa and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Barton, John. 1996. Reading the Old Testament: Method in Biblical Study. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press.

Beavis, Mary Ann. 2018. “The Parable of the Talents (Matthew 25:14–30): Imagining a Slave’s Perspective.” Journal of Gospels and Acts Research 2 (1): 7–21.

Crossan, David. 1979a. Finding Is the First Act. Trove Folktales and Jesus’ Treasure Parable, Semeia Supplements 9. Missoula: Mont Scholars Press.

Crossan, David. 1979b. “Paradox Gives Rise to Metaphor: Paul Ricoeur’s Hermeneutics and the Parables of Jesus.” Biblical Research 24 (1): 20–37.

Dodd, C. H. 1961. The Parables of the Kingdom. London: Fontana Books. Dragutinović, Predrag. 2010. Uvod u Novi Zavet. Beograd: Pravoslavni bogoslovski fakultet.

Dragutinović, Predrag. 2015. “Is There Orthodox Exegesis? Engaging Contextual Hermeneutics in Orthodox Biblical Studies.” Ortodoksia 55 (1): 7–42.

Duling, Dennis. 1995. “The Matthean Brotherhood and Marginal Scribal Leadership.” U Modelling Early Christianity: Social-Scientific Studies of the New Testament in Its Context, prir. Esler Philip, 159–77. London: Routledge.

Ebner, Martin & Bernhard Heininger. 2018. Exegese des Neuen Testaments: ein Arbeitsbuch für Lehre und Praxis. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh.

Elliott, John Hall. 1995. Social Scientific Criticism of the New Testament. London: SPCK. Estes, Douglas. 2017. “The Literary Approach to the Bible.” U Literary Approaches to the Bible, prir. Estes Douglas & Douglas Mangum, Lexham Methods Series (Volume 4), 1–36. Bellingham: Lexham Press.

Frey, Jörg. 2012. “Die Fragmente des Nazoräerevangeliums.” U Antike christliche Apokryphen in deutscher Übersetzung; I. Band: Evangelien und Verwandtes: Teilband 1, prir. Markschies Christoph, Jens Schröter & Andreas Heiser, 623–648. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

Foxhall, Lin. 1990. “The Dependent Tenant: Land Leasing and Labour in Italy and Greece.” Journal of Roman Studies 80 (1): 97–114.

Geertz, Clifford. 1973. “Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture.” U The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays, 3–30. New York: Basic Books.

Geertz, Clifford. 1975. “On the Nature of Anthropological Understanding.” American Scientist 63 (1): 47–53.

Genette, Gérard. 1990. Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Giambrone, Anthony. 2019. “A Note on Luke’s Parable of the Minas and the Ancient Practice of Burying Coin Hoards.” New Testament Studies 65 (4): 589–97.

Glancy, Jennifer. 2006. Slavery in Early Christianity. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.

Glancy, Jennifer. 2011. “Slavery and the Rise of Christianity.” U The Cambridge World History of Slavery. Volume 1: The Ancient Mediterranean World, prir. Bradley Keith & Paul Cartledge, 456–81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Grundmann, Walter. 1964. “ἀγαθός.” U Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, prir. Gerhard Kittel, 1:10–17. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.

Hatter, Johnattan. 2021. “Slavery and the Enslaved in the Roman World, the Jewish World, and the Synoptic Gospels.” Currents in Biblical Research 20 (1): 97–127.

Hezser, Catherine. 2011. “Slavery and the Jews”. U The Cambridge World History of Slavery. Volume 1: The Ancient Mediterranean World, prir. Bradley Keith & Paul Cartledge, 238–55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jeremias, Joachim. 1963. The Parables of Jesus. New York: C. Scribner’s Sons.

Jülicher, Adolf. 1889. Die Gleichnisreden Jesu. Freiburg im Brisgau: J.C.B. Mohr.

Klein, William, Craig Blomberg, & Robert Hubbard. 1993. Introduction to Biblical Interpretation. Dallas: Word.

Kloppenborg, John. 2008. “The Growth and Impact of Agricultural Tenancy in Jewish Palestine (III BCE-I CE).” Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 51 (1): 31–66.

Kovačević, Ivan. 2015. „Fudbal i Film: Drug Pretsednik – Centarfor.“ Etnoantropološki Problemi 10 (3): 743–63.

Kovačević, Ivan. 2017. „Montevideo, Bog te video – ideološki švedski sto kao osnov blokbastera.“ Etnoantropološki Problemi 12 (4): 965–83.

Kuper, Adam. 2016. “Anthropologists and the Bible.” U Local Knowledge, Global Stage. Histories of Anthropology Annual 10, prir. Darnell Regna & Frederic Gleach, 1–30. Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press.

Luz, Ulrich. 2005a. Matthew 8–20: A Commentary. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.

Luz, Ulrich. 2005b. Matthew 21–28: A Commentary. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.

Luz, Ulrich. 2014. Theologische Hermeneutik des Neuen Testaments. Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener Theologie.

Luz, Ulrich. 2018. Matejeva priča o Isusu. Prev. sa nemačkog Fiva Savković. Beograd: Manastir Gradac i Biblijski institut PBF.

Malina, Bruce & Richard Rohrbaugh. 1992. Social Science Commentary on the Synoptic Gospels. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.

Neyrey, Jerome. 1995. “Loss of Wealth, Loss of Family and Loss of Honor: A Cultural Interpretation of the Original Four Makarisms.” U Modelling Early Christianity: Social-Scientific Studies of the New Testament in Its Context, prir. Esler Philip, 139–58. London: Routledge, 1995.

Münch, Christian. 2007. “Gewinnen oder verlieren (von den anvertrauten Geldern) – Q 19,12 f.15–24.26.” U Kompendium Der Gleichnisse Jesu, prir. Ruben Zimmermann, 240–54. Gütersloh: Mohn.

Nestle, Eberhard, Erwin Nestle, Barbara Aland, Kurt Aland, Johannes Karavidopoulos, Carlo Maria Martini, Bruce Manning Metzger, Holger Strutwolf, & Institut für Neutestamentliche Textforschung, eds. 2022. Novum Testamentum Graece. 28. revidierte Auflage, 7. korrigierter Druck. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft.

Oakman, Douglas 2013. “Execrating?: Or Execrable Peasants?” U The Galilean Economy in the Time of Jesus, prir. Fiensy David & Ralph Hawkins, 139– 64. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature.

Ostia Antica. 2023. “The Roman undertakers.” https://www.ostia-antica.org/ dict/topics/laurentina/presentation/laurentina-9.htm (pristupljeno 30. decembra 2023).

Overman, Andrew. 1990. Matthew’s Gospel and Formative Judaism: The Social World of the Matthean Community. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.

Patterson, Orlando. 1983. Slavery and Social Death: A Comparative Study. Harvard University Press.

Pentiuc, Eugen, prir. 2022. The Oxford Handbook of the Bible in Orthodox Christianity. New York: Oxford University Press.

Pfoh, Emanuel. 2010. “Anthropology and Biblical Studies: A Critical Manifesto.” U Anthropology and the Bible, prir. Pfoh Emanuel, 15–35. Piscataway: Gorgias Press.

Popović, Anto. 2005. Načela i metode za tumačenje Biblije. Komentar Papina govora i dokumenta biblijske komisije Tumačenje Biblije u Crkvi. Zagreb: Kršćanska sadašnjost.

Popović, Justin. 1979. Tumačenje Svetog Evandjelja po Mateju. Valjevo: Manastir Ćelije.

Porter, Phillip. 2021. “The Parable of the Talents (Matt 25:14–30): Preparing Jesus’ Disciples to Lead the Worldwide Expansion of the Mission of Jesus.” Novum Testamentum 63 (2): 159–76.

Rengstorf, Karl Heinrich. 1964. “δοῦλος, σύνδουλος, δούλη, δουλεύω, δουλεία.” U Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, prir. Gerhard Kittel, 2:261–79. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.

Rogerson, John. 1981. “Anthropological and Theological Approaches to the Old Testament: A Rejoinder.” Journal of the Anthropological Society of Oxford 12 (1): 16–20.

Schultz, Brian. 2007. “Jesus as Archelaus in thе Раrаblе of the Pounds (Lk. 19:11– 27).” Novum Тestamentum 49 (1): 105–127.

Snodgrass, Klyne. 2008. Stories with Intent: A Comprehensive Guide to the Parables of Jesus. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.

Stegemann, Ekkehard. 2001. Jesus Movement: A Social History of It’s First Century. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.

Szesnat, Holger. 2019. “The Non-Canonical Version of the Story of Entrusted Money in Nicetas of Heraclea’s Catena in Lucam: Revisiting Text and Manuscripts.” Neotestamentica 53 (1): 149–74.

Strack, Hermann & Paul Billerbeck. 1922. Kommentar zum Neuen Testament aus Talmud und Midrash. Band 1: Das Evangelium nach Matthäus. C. H. Beck’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.

Tatalović, Vladan. 2017. „Sin Čovečiji u masoretskom tekstu (MT) Danilove knjige.“ Bogoslovlje 76 (1): 49–63.

Tatalović, Vladan. 2018. „Sin Čovečiji u grčkom tekstu Danilove knjige.“ Bogoslovlje 77 (1): 5–16.

Tatalović, Vladan. 2023. „Ko je Sin Božiji/Višnjega u Aramejskoj apokalipsi (4Q246)?“ Bogoslovlje 82 (2): 67–87.

Ukpong, Justin 2012. „The Parable of the Talents (Matt 25:14–30): Commandation or Critique of Exploitation?: A Social-Historical and Theological Reading.“ Neotestamentica 46 (1): 190–207.

Von Wahlde, Urban. 2014. “Farewell speech III. New Testament.” U Encyclopedia of the Bible and its Reception (Essenes - Fideism), prir. Dale Allison, Christine Helmer & Volker Leppin, Volume 8:878–880. Berlin: De Gruyter.

Weiser, Alfons. 1971. Die Knechtsgleichnisse Der Synoptischen Evangelien. Studien zum Alten und Neuen Testament. München: Kösel-Verlag.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-15

How to Cite

ТАТАЛОВИЋ, В. (2024). Anthropological Dimension of the Parable of the Talents (Mt 25, 14–30). ГЛАСНИК ЕТНОГРАФСКОГ ИНСТИТУТА САНУ, 72(2), 271-293. https://doi.org/10.2298/GEI2402271T

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.