Community Mapping Methodology – Researching the Heritage of the Romani Women Emancipation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2298/GEI2402249DKeywords:
othering/Other, anthropological method of researching othering/the Other, community mapping, Roma women, “HEROINES” projectAbstract
This paper presents the relatively new – in local framework of humanities rarely applied – method of community mapping is introduced and explored. Community mapping is a participatory research approach that focuses on the needs of social groups, that are evaluated and holistically understood in the process; and used as a ground for designing policies for the further development of community research. The main case study of the analysis is the project – “HEROINES: Heritage of Emancipation – Empowering Roma Women through Networks of Solidarity”, implemented by Institute of Ethnography SASA, Roma Women Center “Bibija” and the Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade. The project is supported by the Center for the Promotion of Science (CPN). This citizen’s research project uses community mapping as its main method, with Roma women – as simultaneously marginal and marginalized in the broader society – being the main target group and the main representative of the other in their social reality.
Downloads
References
Aberley, Doug. 1999. Giving the land a voice: mapping our home places. Salt Spring Island: Land Trust Alliance of British Columbia.
Bart, Fredrik. 1997. „Etničke grupe i njihove granice.“ U Teorije o etnicitetu, prir. Filip Putinja & Žoslin Stref-Fenar, 211–260. Beograd: XX vek.
Barth, Fredrik. 2000. “Boundaries and Connections.” In Signifiying identities: anthropological perspectives on boundaries and contested values, prir. Anthony P. Cohen, 17–36. London: Routledge.
Bašić, Ivana. 2017. „Identitet.“ U Mali leksikon srpske kulture – Etnologija i antropologija, prir. Ljiljana Gavrilović, 116–124. Beograd: JP Službeni glasnik i Etnografski i nstitut SANU.
Cochrane, Logan & Corbett, John. 2020. “Participatory Mapping.” In Handbook of Communication for Development and Social Change, prir. Servaes Јаn, 705–714. Berlin: Springer.
Dumont, Jean-Paul. 1986. “Prologue to Ethnography or Prolegomena to Anthropography.” Ethos 14 (4): 344–367.
Fabian, Johannes. 1984. “The other and the eye: time and the rhetoric of vision.” Communication. Information Medias Theories 6 (2–3): 290–322.
Fabian, Joannes. 1985. “Culture, time and the object of anthropology.” Berkshire Review 20: 7–23.
Fabian, Johannes. 1990. “Presence and Representation: The Other and Anthropological Writing.” Critical Inquiry 16 (4): 753–772.
Flavelle, Alix. 2002. Mapping our land: a guide to making maps of our own communities and traditional lands. Edmonton: Lone Pine.
Gavrilović, Zoran. 2009. „Analiza političkog položaja Roma u Srbiji.“ U Stanje političke zajednice Roma u Srbiji, ur. Zoran Gavrilović, 32–67. Beograd: OSCE & Biro za društvena istraživanja.
Gerc, Kliford. 2007. „Upotreba različitosti.“ Kultura – časopis za teoriju i sociologiju kulture i kulturnu politiku (118–119): 87–108.
Gürel, Emet & Merba Tat. 2017. “SWOT Analysis: A Theoretical Review”. The Journal of International Social Research 10: 994–1006.
Hage, Ghassan. 2012. “Critical anthropological thought and the radical political imaginary today.” Critique of Anthropology 32: 285–308.
Hall, Stuart. 1973. Encoding and Decoding in the Television Discourse. Birmingham: Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies.
Hall, Stuart. 1980. “Encoding / Decoding.” In Culture, Media, Language: Working Papers in Cultural Studies, ur. S. Hall, D. Hobson, A. Lowe & P. Willis, 128–138. London: Hutchinson.
Hall, Stuart. 1998. Representation. London: Sage and Open University. Krstić, Nemanja. 2020. „O metodi dubinskog intervjua“. Godišnjak za sociologiju 16 (25): 77–101.
Lydon, Maeve. 2003. “Community Mapping: The Recovery (and Discovery) of our Common Ground.” Geomatica 57: 1–31.
Rapport, Nigel & Joanna Overing. 2000. Social and Cultural Anthropology: The Key Concepts. London: Routledge.
Ribić, Vladimir. 2007. Primenjena antropologija. Razvoj primenjenih antropoloških istraživanja u Velikoj Britaniji i Sjedinjenim Američkim Državama. Beograd: Odeljenje za etnologiju i antropologiju Filozofskog fakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu i SGC.
Said, Edvard. 2000. Orijentalizam. Beograd: Biblioteka XX vek.
Servaes, Jan & Patchanee Malikhao. 2020. “Communication for Development and Social Change: Three Development Paradigms, Two Communication Models, and Many Applications and Approaches.” In Handbook of Communication for Development and Social Change, prir. Servaes Јаn, 63–92. Berlin: Springer.
Simić, Marina. 2014. „Studije kulture i antropologija: sudar titana ili narcizam malih razlika?“ Genero 18: 89–108.
Thambinathan, Vivetha & Elisabeth Anne Kinsella. 2021. “Decolonizing Methodologies in Qualitative Research: Creating Spaces for Transformative Praxis.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 20. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211014766
Tobias, Terry. 2000. Chief Kerry’s moose: a guidebook to land use and occupancy mapping, researchdesign, and data collection. Vancouver: Union of BC Indian Chiefs&Ecotrust Canada.
Vučinić Nešković, Vesna. 2013. Metodologija terenskog istraživanja u antropologiji. Beograd: Srpski genealoški centar – Beograd i Odeljenje za etnologiju i antropologiju Filozofskog fakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu.
Wood, Denis. 1994. “Memory, love, distortion, power: What is a map?” Orion Magazine 13 (2): 24–33.
Zlatanović, Sanja. 2013. „Propustljivost granice: Srbi / ’Srpski Cigani’ u enklavi Vitina.“ Teme 37 (3): 1079–1099.
Zlatanović, Ljubiša. 2014. „Učesničko posmatranje kao istraživačka metoda u antropologiji – prednosti i ograničenja.“ Glasnik Antropološkog društva Srbije 49: 167–71.
Žikić, Bojan. 2011. „Društveni činioci zdravstvene vulnerabilnosti marginalizovanih društvenih grupa.“ Etnoantropološki problemi 6 (3): 783–805.
Žikić, Bojan. 2012. „Terensko istraživanje i naučno znanje u etnologiji i antropologiji.“ Antropologija 12 (1): 9–25.
Žikić, Bojan. 2019. „Konstruisanje drugosti kao mizantropičan postupak: primer televizijske serije ’metalna zvezda’.“ Antropologija 19 (2): 9–35.
Žikić, Bojan & Miloš Milenković. 2018. „Muzika kao sredstvo proizvođenja sociokulturne drugosti.“ Etnoantropološki problemi 13 (2): 295–325.
Интернет извори
A Comprehensive Guide To Community Mapping For Planning Professionals. 2023. Приступљено 12. маја 2024. https://www.maptionnaire.com/blog/guide-to-community-mapping-for-planning.
Centar za nematerijalno kulturno nasleđe Srbije. Pristupljeno 15. Maja 2024. https://nkns.rs. https://nkns.rs
„Finansirani projekti građanskih naučnih istraživanja 2023“, Centar za promociju nauke. Pristupljeno 25. maja 2024. https://www.cpn.edu.rs/javnipoziv-gni-2023/.
„HEROINE – Nasleđe emancipacije: osnaživanje Romkinja kroz izgradnju mreža solidarnosti“. Etnografski institut SANU. Pristupljeno 1. Jun 2024. https://etnoinstitut.co.rs/lat/aktivnosti/heroine.
Konvencija o očuvanju kulturnog nasleđa. Član 2. Pristupljeno 15. Maja 2024. http://demo.paragraf.rs/demo/combined/Old/t/t2010_06/t06_0289.htm.
UNESKO Lista nematerijalnog kulturnog nasleđa čovečanstva. Pristupljeno 25. maja 2024. https://ich.unesco.org/en/lists.Центар за нематеријално културно наслеђе Србије. Приступљено 15. Маја 2024. https://nkns.rs.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 ГЛАСНИК ЕТНОГРАФСКОГ ИНСТИТУТА САНУ
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
